

Compulsory reading
Best Novel Written in the 20th CenturyAn author's ability to see humanity from an unusual point of view is nothing new. Gary's genius lies in his ability to make the reader see clearly through his eyes. His narration reveals truths in human actions that must be despaired, pitied, and celebrated all in the same sentence. His characters are not criminals, nor are they very likeable. In this book they include a dangerous idealist, a young German girl who follows him faithfully, a fanatical African nationalist who wants to use him, a disgraced American officer, an amoral gunrunner, a famous photo-journalist, and a French administrator who wishes to be reincarnated as a tree. The reader will lament their many failings and rejoice in their few victories not for anything they have done, but for who they are: human beings taken by surprise by the human condition. His characters reveal how human beings reform the world around them when history has become overwhelming. Sometimes it is world history, often it is a character's personal history.
Les Racines du Ciel is not intended to teach the reader how to live a better life by describing characters who live life badly. The book will remind you of basic traits of humanity. It asks what is goodness and decency and how are they better than evil and brutality? And if they are better, why do they so seldom win in the end? Reading a Romain Gary novel is smiling through the tears.
Unfortunately, the reverence held for the author in Europe is matched by the indifference of readers in the United States. Several of his books have been translated into English but are now out of print. I highly recommend any of Romain Gary's books; Les Racines du Ciel is simply the best of his work.
A book for those who believe in life and despair of mankind

Remarkable, unique, rewarding, unconventional tour of Rome.

Just what I needed!

Great reworkings of Greek Tragedy
Brevity and depth in a great tragedy.
surprisingly readable

a pleasant read
If you're not "Floating" you're sinking.
Want to be Entertained? Read this book!

Useful outside of the "Dark Ages" setting?
A Handbook for the Dark MedievalThe primary resources in this book are its design-a-fief chapter, its notes on the Tremere's Gargoyles, and its relics. Though it is, essentially, a rule book supplement, it gives insight into several "historical" stories, including the diablerie of Brujah by Troile.
Do you need this book to play a game of Vampire: the Dark Ages? No. Do you need it to run a serious chronicle? I say yes. An "authentic" city gives your game the flair it was meant to have.
A nessary book

Brittanicus excellent

Racine's version of the myth of Phaedrus and HippolytusMy students read "Phaedra" after Euripides's "Hippolytus" as part of an analogy criticism assignment, in which they compare/contrast the two versions, which are decidedly different, to say the least. In the "original" Greek version Hippolytus is a follower of Artemis, and the jealous Aphrodite causes his stepmother to fall in love with him. Phaedra accuses Hippolytus of rape and then hangs herself; Theseus banished his son who is killed before Artemis arrives to tell the truth. In Racine's version Hippolytus is a famous hater of women who falls in love with Aricia, a princess of the blood line of Athens. When false word comes that Theseus is dead, Phaedra moves to put her own son on the throne. In the end the same characters end up dead, but the motivations and other key elements are different.
While I personally would not go so far as to try and argue how Racine's neo-classical version represents the France of 1677, I have found that comparing and contrasting the two versions compels students to think about the choices each dramatist has made. Both the similarities and the differences between "Hippolytus" and "Phaedra" are significant enough to facilitate this effort. Note: Other dramatic versions of this myth include Seneca's play "Phaedra," "Fedra" by Gabriele D'Annunzio, "Thesee" by Andrea Gide, and "The Cretan Woman" by Robinson Jeffers.


Clever and surprising